Kinetics, SOA yields and chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol from β-caryophyllene ozonolysis with and without nitrogen oxides between 213 and 313 K

The data in the Excel file is related to the publication Gao et al., ACP, 2022. Each sheet of the Excel file corresponds to one plot in the publication. The data originates mainly from FIGAERO-CIMS and HR-ToF-AMS (both Aerodyne Inc.) measurements.

“Kinetics, SOA yields and chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol from β-caryophyllene ozonolysis with and without nitrogen oxides between 213 and 313 K”
Linyu Gao1,2; Junwei Song1,2; Claudia Mohr3; Wei Huang4; Magdalena Vallon1;
Feng Jiang1,2; Thomas Leisner1,5; and Harald Saathoff1

1 Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
2 Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Working Group for Environmental Mineralogy and Environmental System Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
3 Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
4 Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research / Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
5 Institute of Environmental Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence to: Linyu Gao (linyu.gao@kit.edu) and Dr. Harald Saathoff (harald.saathoff@kit.edu)
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1067, in review, 2022. (accepted on April 4th, 2022)

The data in the Excel file is related to the publication Gao et al., ACP, 2022. Each sheet of the Excel file corresponds to one plot in the publication. The data originates mainly from FIGAERO-CIMS and HR-ToF-AMS (both Aerodyne Inc.) measurements.
“Kinetics, SOA yields and chemical composition of secondary organic aerosol from β-caryophyllene ozonolysis with and without nitrogen oxides between 213 and 313 K”
Linyu Gao1,2; Junwei Song1,2; Claudia Mohr3; Wei Huang4; Magdalena Vallon1;
Feng Jiang1,2; Thomas Leisner1,5; and Harald Saathoff1
1 Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
2 Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Working Group for Environmental Mineralogy and Environmental System Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
3 Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
4 Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research / Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
5 Institute of Environmental Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
Correspondence to: Linyu Gao (linyu.gao@kit.edu) and Dr. Harald Saathoff (harald.saathoff@kit.edu)
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1067, in review, 2022. (accepted on April 4th, 2022)

The data in the Excel file is related to the publication Gao et al., ACP, 2022. Each sheet of the Excel file corresponds to one plot in the publication. The data originates mainly from FIGAERO-CIMS and HR-ToF-AMS (both Aerodyne Inc.) measurements (see corresponding readme.pdf file).

The data in the Excel file is related to the publication Gao et al., ACP, 2022. Each sheet of the Excel file corresponds to one plot in the publication. The data originates mainly from FIGAERO-CIMS and HR-ToF-AMS (both Aerodyne Inc.) measurements (see corresponding readme.pdf file).